Mp54-07 Comparision of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in the Management of Small Moderated-Sized Renal Stones: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Journal of Urology - Netherlands
doi 10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.577
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
Urology
Date
Authors
Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Related search

Comparison of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Versus Ureteroscopy Holmium Laser Lithotripsy in the Management of Ureteral Stones: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Medical & Surgical Urology
2016English

Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Renal and Ureteral Stones

Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira
Medicine
2015English

Comparison of Ureterorenoscopic Lithotripsy and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in the Management of Distal Ureteral Stones

Kafkas Journal of Medical Sciences
2015English

Extracorporeal Shock-Wave Lithotripsy: Prevalence of Renal Stones 3-21 Months After Treatment

American Journal of Roentgenology
MedicineNuclear MedicineRadiologyImaging
1988English

A Rare Complication of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy: Intrarenal Hematoma Mimicking Pelvis Renalis Tumor

Case Reports in Urology
2015English

Infected Hepatic Hematoma After Renal Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy

Clinics
Medicine
2006English

Bilateral Single-Session Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for the Treatment of Bilateral Renal Stones

International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
MedicineUrology
2013English

Evaluation of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL): Efficacy in Treatment of Urinary System Stones

Acta Informatica Medica
Medicine
2014English

Treatment of Renal Stones by Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy

European Urology
Urology
2001English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy