Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Unauthorized Practice of Law: Supreme Court Holds States Cannot Restrict Authorized Activities of Nonlawyer Patent Office Practitioner
Duke Law Journal
- United States
doi 10.2307/1370946
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Categories
Law
Date
January 1, 1964
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
JSTOR
Related search
Suspecting the States: Supreme Court Review of State-Court State-Law Judgments
Michigan Law Review
Law
Canada's Supreme Court Abolishes ‘Promise of the Patent’
Pharmaceutical patent analyst
Medicine
Drug Discovery
Pharmaceutical Science
Supreme Court of the United States Employment Law Commentary 2007 Term
SSRN Electronic Journal
Supreme Court of the United States
American Journal of International Law
Law
International Relations
Political Science
Supreme Court of the United States
Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association (1961)
Sorcerers' Apprentices: 100 Years of Law Clerks at the United States Supreme Court
Choice Reviews Online
The Supreme Court of the United States
Yale Law Journal
Law
Patents: Supreme Court Holds Post-Expiration Royalty Agreements Unlawful Per Se
Duke Law Journal
Law
"Welfare Rights" in the Context of the Practice of the United States Supreme Court
ScienceRise: Juridical Science