Identifying Approaches for Assessing Methodological and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews: A Descriptive Study

Systematic Reviews - United Kingdom
doi 10.1186/s13643-017-0507-6
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
Medicine
Date
Authors
Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Related search

Does Updating Improve the Methodological and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews?

BMC Medical Research Methodology
EpidemiologyHealth Informatics
2006English

Poor Methodological Quality but Higher Reporting Standards Seen in Systematic Reviews in Radiation Dermatitis

International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
OncologyRadiologyCancer ResearchRadiationNuclear MedicineImaging
2019English

Methods of Conduct and Reporting of Living Systematic Reviews: A Protocol for a Living Methodological Survey

F1000Research
GeneticsMolecular BiologyPharmacologyBiochemistryMicrobiology ImmunologyMedicineToxicologyPharmaceutics
2019English

Systematic Review Adherence to Methodological or Reporting Quality

Systematic Reviews
Medicine
2017English

Searching for Randomized Controlled Trials and Systematic Reviews on Exercise. A Descriptive Study

Sao Paulo Medical Journal
Medicine
2014English

The Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Industrial and Organizational Psychology: A Systematic Review

Frontiers in Psychology
Psychology
2017English

Integration of Care for Hypertension and Diabetes: A Scoping Review Assessing the Evidence From Systematic Reviews and Evaluating Reporting

BMC Health Services Research
Health Policy
2018English

Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews

PLoS Medicine
BiochemistryBiotechnologyMolecular BiologyCell BiologyMedicine
2007English

Quality of Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Surgical Randomized Clinical Trials

BJS open
Surgery
2020English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy