The Importance of Randomised vs Non-Randomised Trials – Authors' Reply

The Lancet - United Kingdom
doi 10.1016/s0140-6736(19)31111-0
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
Medicine
Date
Authors
Publisher

Elsevier BV

Related search

Randomised Controlled Trials

Eye
MedicineArtsSensory SystemsOphthalmologyHumanities
1995English

Authors' Reply Re: Inositol Treatment of Anovulation in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised Trials

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
GynecologyObstetrics
2017English

Randomised Trials and Ribavirin

Archives of Disease in Childhood
Child HealthPediatricsPerinatology
1988English

Authors' Reply Re: Diagnostic Work Up for Postmenopausal Bleeding: A Randomised Controlled Trial

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
GynecologyObstetrics
2017English

Randomised Trials on Vitamin C

British Journal of Nutrition
MedicineNutritionDietetics
2010English

A Protocol for a Systematic Review of Non-Randomised Evaluations of Strategies to Increase Participant Retention to Randomised Controlled Trials

Systematic Reviews
Medicine
2018English

Covariance Modelling for Randomised Controlled Trials

Trials
MedicinePharmacology
2013English

Randomised Controlled Trials in General Practice

BMJ
1995English

Reporting Attrition in Randomised Controlled Trials

BMJ
2006English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy