Supervising Federal Capital Punishment: Why the Attorney General Should Defer When U.S. Attorneys Recommend Against the Death Penalty

Virginia Law Review - United States
doi 10.2307/3202361
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
Law
Date
Authors
Publisher

JSTOR

Related search

Attorneys and Attorney Tariff in Slovenia

2018English

Serial Killers – Views on Why Sadipaths Kill, the Death Penalty, and Rehabilitation

American Journal of Law and Legal Studies
2020English

Why Plaintiffs’ Attorneys Use Contingent and Defense Attorneys Fixed Fee Contracts

International Review of Law and Economics
LawFinanceEconomicsEconometrics
2016English

On the Reasons for Origination and Fundamental Arguments Against Capital Punishment

History of state and law
2019English

The Death Penalty as Incapacitation

SSRN Electronic Journal
2018English

Guilty but Mentally Ill and the Death Penalty: Punishment Full of Sound and Fury, Signifying Nothing

Duke Law Journal
Law
1993English

Psychiatry and the Death Penalty.

Journal of Medical Ethics
ArtsHumanitiesLegal AspectsHealth PolicyHealthEthicsIssues
1988English

Capital Punishment

English

Attorneys Before the Grand Jury: Assertion of the Attorney-Client Privilege to Protect a Client's Identity

Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
Law
1984English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy