Amanote Research

Amanote Research

  • Register
  • Sign In

Figure 2: Mean Counts of Male Sage-Grouse at Individual Leks by Year and Working Group (A–H).

doi 10.7717/peerj.5417/fig-2

Full Text

Abstract

Available in

Date

Unknown

Authors

Unknown

Publisher

PeerJ


Related search

Supplemental Information 7: Table S1. The Relative Importance (Wi) of Spatial Scale as a Predictor of the Count of Males Sage-Grouse at Individual Leks.

English

How Many Leks Does It Take? Minimum Samples Sizes for Measuring Local-Scale Conservation Outcomes in Greater Sage-Grouse

Avian Conservation and Ecology
EvolutionEcologyNatureSystematicsAnimal ScienceLandscape ConservationBehaviorZoology
2020English

Predators, Predator Removal, and Sage-Grouse: A Review

Journal of Wildlife Management
EvolutionEcologyNatureSystematicsBehaviorLandscape Conservation
2016English

Sage-Grouse Lek Guideline Review Report

2011English

Monitoring of Greater Sage-Grouse Habitats and Populations /

2003English

Distribution of Sage-Grouse in North America

Condor
EvolutionEcologySystematicsAnimal ScienceBehaviorZoology
2004English

Husbandry of Wild-Caught Greater Sage-Grouse

Wildlife Society Bulletin
Landscape ConservationNature
2005English

Figure 4: Mean RMDQ Change Scores at Each Time Point, by Group.

English

Figure 3: Mean NPRS Change Scores at Each Time Point, by Group.

English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote


© 2026 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy