Amanote Research

Amanote Research

    RegisterSign In

Figure 5: Expression of ALDBSSCT0000007366 (A) and ALDBSSCT0000006918 (B) in Different Tissues Using RT-qPCR (**P < 0.01; *P < 0.05).

doi 10.7717/peerj.5997/fig-5
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract

Available in full text

Date

Unknown

Authors

Unknown

Publisher

PeerJ


Related search

Table S2: Simple Correlation Among Studied Characteristics in “Early Mature” Walnut Accessions. ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗p < 0.05

English

Figure 5: Enriched GO Terms ( P < 0.05) of DEGs in RHR and CHR.

English

Figure 4: STEM Identified the Temporal Expression Profiles of mRNAs (A) and lncRNAs (B) With a P-Value < 0.05.

English

Figure 5: RT-qPCR Validation of DE miRNAs and DEGs.

English

Figure 5: LEFSe Analysis of the Hooded Crane Guts Bacteria in Different Wintering Periods (LDA > 2, P < 0.05).

English

Figure 5: Expression Analysis of GmVQ Genes in Different Tissues and Different Stages.

English

Figure 6: RT-qPCR Validation of RNA-seq Relative Expression Estimation.

English

Figure S5: The Linear Regression of Non-Amphipods Described Against (A) SPP Described (R2 = 0.0003, P > 0.05), and (B) the First Year of Author’s Publication (R2 = 0.16, P < 0.05)

English

Figure 8: Expression Pattern Analysis of HD-Zip Genes in P. Mume in Different Tissues of Young Stems.

English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy