Amanote Research

Amanote Research

    RegisterSign In

Profile Evidence, Fairness, and the Risks of Mistaken Convictions

Ethics - United States
doi 10.1086/705764
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
Philosophy
Date

January 1, 2020

Authors
Marcello Di BelloCollin O’Neil
Publisher

University of Chicago Press


Related search

The Budgetary Repercussions of Capital Convictions

2001English

False Convictions and True Conscience

Oxford Journal of Legal Studies
Law
2015English

Pharmaceuticals in the Environment: Scientific Evidence of Risks and Its Regulation

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
BiochemistryAgriculturalGeneticsMolecular BiologyBiological Sciences
2014English

Value and Development of Mistaken Doctorin

Keikinzoku/Journal of Japan Institute of Light Metals
Mechanics of MaterialsAlloysMaterials ChemistryMetalsMechanical Engineering
1983English

What Is the Relevance of Procedural Fairness to Making Determinations About Medical Evidence?

AMA journal of ethics
Health PolicyEthicsHealthIssuesLegal Aspects
2017English

The Role of Official Misconduct in Wrongful Convictions

English

L’État Français Et L’expression Des Convictions Religieuses

Politique et Sociétés
2011English

Wrongful Convictions and the State Risk Harm Paradigm

International Journal of Law and Public Administration
2019English

Financial Dollarization and Systemic Risks: New Empirical Evidence

Journal of International Money and Finance
EconomicsEconometricsFinance
2012English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy