Amanote Research

Amanote Research

    RegisterSign In

Response to “Shifting the Conversation on Outcomes Reporting”

American Journal of Transplantation - United Kingdom
doi 10.1111/ajt.14968
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
TransplantationAllergyImmunologyPharmacology
Date

June 28, 2018

Authors
John Devin PeipertMichael M. I. AbecassisZeeshan ButtDavid CellaDaniela P. Ladner
Publisher

Wiley


Related search

Does Outcomes-Based Reporting Contribute to or Contradict the Realisation of Social Outcomes?

2016English

Outcomes Reporting of the FAME Trial

The Lancet
Medicine
2016English

Introduction to the Minitrack on Mediated Conversation

2020English

Response to Letter to the Editor, “Measurement of Workplace Violence Reporting”

Workplace Health and Safety
EnvironmentalPublic HealthNursingOccupational Health
2016English

Locomotion in Response to Shifting Climate Zones: Not So Fast

Annual Review of Physiology
Physiology
2010English

Five-Tier Utility: A Start on the Path to Better Reporting, in Response to Schold and Buccini

American Journal of Transplantation
TransplantationAllergyImmunologyPharmacology
2018English

Rate of Asthma Trial Outcomes Reporting on ClinicalTrials.gov and in the Published Literature

Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
AllergyImmunology
2014English

Reporting and Interpreting Task Performance in Go/No-Go Affective Shifting Tasks

Frontiers in Psychology
Psychology
2017English

The Impact of Public Reporting on Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BMC Health Services Research
Health Policy
2016English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy