Amanote Research

Amanote Research

    RegisterSign In

Comparison of Two Methods of Screening for Genital Chlamydial Infection in Women Attending in General Practice: Cross Sectional Survey

BMJ
doi 10.1136/bmj.315.7102.226
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract

Available in full text

Date

July 26, 1997

Authors
L. GrunJ. Tassano-SmithC. CarderA. M JohnsonA. RobinsonE. MurrayJ. StephensonA. HainesA. CopasG. Ridgway
Publisher

BMJ


Related search

Risk Factors for Resistance in Urinary Tract Infections in Women in General Practice: A Cross-Sectional Survey

Journal of Infection
Infectious DiseasesMicrobiology
2015English

Genital Chlamydial Infection.

BMJ
1978English

Control of Genital Chlamydial Infection

Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases
1994English

Does Detection of Chlamydial Antibodies by Microimmunofluorescence Help in Managing Chlamydial Lower Genital Tract Infection in Women?

Sexually Transmitted Infections
DermatologyInfectious Diseases
1985English

Controlling Genital Chlamydial Infection

BMJ
1996English

Sex Inequalities in Ischaemic Heart Disease in General Practice: Cross Sectional Survey

BMJ
2001English

Health Screening for Women With Physical Disability in Australian General Practice: A Survey

Collegian
Nursing
2019English

Consumer Satisfaction With Practice Nursing: A Cross-Sectional Survey in New Zealand General Practice

Australian Journal of Primary Health
Health PolicyPublic HealthOccupational HealthEnvironmental
2015English

Management of Asthma in Pregnant Women by General Practitioners: A Cross Sectional Survey

BMC Family Practice
Family Practice
2011English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy