Preserving Methodological Consistency: A Reply to Raftery, McGeorge and Walters

Construction Management and Economics - United Kingdom
doi 10.1080/014461997372845
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Related search

The Consistency of Probabilistic Regresses. A Reply to Jeanne Peijnenburg and David Atkinson

Studia Logica
Philosophy of ScienceLogicHistory
2010English

Preserving Nearest Neighbor Consistency in Cluster Analysis

English

A Methodological Construction of an Efficient Sequential Consistency Protocol

English

Human and Animal Health: Strengthening the Link: Authors' Reply to Methodological Concerns

BMJ
2005English

Dr. Addington and Colleagues Reply to Methodological Issues in a Comparative Study of Ziprasidone and Risperidone

Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
MedicinePsychiatryMental Health
2006English

Reply to “Clinical and Pathologic Factors Associated With Subclinical Spread of Invasive Melanoma”: Statistical and Methodological Issues

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Dermatology
2017English

Reply to FNA Biopsy in Grading Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Methodological Issues Regarding Diagnostic Value

Cancer cytopathology
Cancer ResearchOncology
2018English

Reply To: Joint Associations of Smoking and Television Viewing Time on Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease Mortality-Methodological Issues

International Journal of Cancer
Cancer ResearchOncology
2017English

A Reply to Critics

Filosofskii Zhurnal
PhilosophyPhilosophy of ScienceHistory
2018English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy