Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Figure 2: Impact Factors Were Higher for Journals With the Strongest Data Sharing Policies (DSM 1) Compared to Journals With No Mention of Data Sharing (DSM 6).
doi 10.7717/peerj.3208/fig-2
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Figure 1: Percentage of Journals Per Each Data Sharing Mark (DSM).
Sharing the Wealth: ASBMR Journals Update Policies on Data Sharing and Data Repositories
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Endocrinology
Orthopedics
Sports Medicine
Metabolism
Diabetes
Recent Trends in Medical Journals’ Data Sharing Policies and Statements of Data Availability
Archives of Plastic Surgery
Surgery
Journal Research Data Sharing Policies: A Study of Highly-Cited Journals in Neuroscience, Physics, and Operations Research
Scientometrics
Computer Science Applications
Social Sciences
Library
Information Sciences
Sharing Data to Understand Spatial Variation in the Musculoskeletal System: Can the Uptake Being Seen in Open-Access Online Journals Extend to Data Repositories?
Orthopedic & Muscular System
Data Sharing for Disasters
Nature
Multidisciplinary
Vocabulary Challenges With Invasive Species Data Sharing
Biodiversity Information Science and Standards
2017 Impact Factors Released for TMS Journals
JOM
Materials Science
Engineering
Citation Rate Unrelated to Journals' Impact Factors
Nature
Multidisciplinary
