Three Persistent Myths in the Environmental Debate

Ecological Economics - Netherlands
doi 10.1016/0921-8009(96)00031-6
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Elsevier BV

Related search

Rationalizing the GMO Debate: The Ordonomic Approach to Addressing Agricultural Myths

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
MutagenesisPublic HealthEnvironmentalHealthToxicologyOccupational HealthPollution
2016English

Three Cultural Myths in the Mill on the Floss

2018English

Three Myths About Twombly-Iqbal

SSRN Electronic Journal
2010English

Debunking Three Myths About Madagascar’s Deforestation

Madagascar Conservation & Development
2013English

Delusions and Three Myths of Irrational Belief

2018English

Environmental Exposure to Lead: Old Myths Never Die – Authors' Reply

The Lancet Public Health
EnvironmentalPublic HealthOccupational Health
2018English

Persistent Lipophilic Environmental Chemicals and Endometriosis: The ENDO Study

Environmental Health Perspectives
MutagenesisPublic HealthEnvironmentalHealthToxicologyOccupational Health
2012English

The CML Story: How Environmental Sciences Entered the Debate on LCA

International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Environmental Science
2006English

'Sure There's Nothing in There Only Water'?: Environmental Ehtics in the Gisborne Lake Debate

English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy