Meta-Analysis of Outcomes of Axillary and Subclavian Implanted Impella 5.0 for Cardiogenic Shock

Journal of Cardiac Failure - United States
doi 10.1016/j.cardfail.2019.07.183
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Elsevier BV

Related search

Hemodynamic Support Using Percutaneous Transfemoral Impella 5.0 and Impella RP for Refractory Cardiogenic Shock

Case Reports in Cardiology
Cardiovascular MedicineCardiology
2019English

A Case of Extended Mechanical Circulatory Support With Impella 5.0 in a Patient With Cardiogenic Shock Secondary to Left Ventricular Aneurysm

Journal of Cardiac Failure
Cardiovascular MedicineCardiology
2019English

Improved Outcomes in Cardiogenic Shock

MD Conference Express
2013English

De-Escalation of Support With Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation and Impella for Cardiogenic Shock: Reply

European Journal of Heart Failure
Cardiovascular MedicineCardiology
2017English

Successful Use of Surgically Placed Impella 5.0 and Central Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Circuit in a Patient With Postcardiotomy Shock

Texas Heart Institute Journal
MedicineCardiovascular MedicineCardiology
2015English

Cardiogenic Shock

Journal of the American Heart Association
Cardiovascular MedicineCardiology
2019English

Cardiogenic Shock.

Postgraduate Medical Journal
Medicine
1985English

Haemodynamic Efficacy of Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device in Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Netherlands Heart Journal
Cardiovascular MedicineCardiology
2019English

Mechanism of Cardiogenic Shock

Circulation Research
Cardiovascular MedicinePhysiologyCardiology
1962English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy