Completeness of Reporting in Abstracts of Randomized Controlled Trials in Subscription and Open Access Journals: Cross-Sectional Study

Trials - United Kingdom
doi 10.1186/s13063-019-3781-x
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Related search

Assessment of the Quality of Reporting in Abstracts of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Five Leading Chinese Medical Journals

PLoS ONE
Multidisciplinary
2010English

Methodological Reporting of Randomized Trials in Five Leading Chinese Nursing Journals

PLoS ONE
Multidisciplinary
2014English

Professional Medical Writing Support and the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trial Reporting: A Cross-Sectional Study

2016English

Quality Assessment of Studies Published in Open Access and Subscription Journals: Results of a Systematic Evaluation

PLoS ONE
Multidisciplinary
2016English

Child vs Adult Randomized Controlled Trials in Specialist Journals

Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine
2010English

Randomized Controlled Comparison of Cross-Sectional Survey Approaches to Optimize Follow-Up Completeness in Clinical Studies

PLoS ONE
Multidisciplinary
2019English

Reporting Quality of Randomized Controlled Trial Abstracts Published in Leading Laser Medicine Journals: An Assessment Using the CONSORT for Abstracts Guidelines

Lasers in Medical Science
DermatologySurgery
2016English

Comparison of the Impact Factors of Subscription Access and Open Access Orthopedics and Sports Medicine Journals in the SCImago Database

Eklem Hastaliklari ve Cerrahisi
SurgeryOrthopedicsSports MedicineRehabilitation
2019English

Risk of Bias of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Orthopaedic Journals

BMC Medical Research Methodology
EpidemiologyHealth Informatics
2013English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy