Can Doctors and Patients Correctly Estimate Cardiovascular Risk? A Cross-Sectional Study in Primary Care

BMJ Open - United Kingdom
doi 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017711
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
Medicine
Date
Authors
Publisher

BMJ

Related search

Smoking Behaviour of Asthmatic Patients in Primary Care: A Cross-Sectional Study

Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare
Medicine
2014English

Medical Errors in Primary Care Clinics – A Cross Sectional Study

BMC Family Practice
Family Practice
2012English

Identifying Domestic Violence: Cross Sectional Study in Primary Care

BMJ
2002English

Patients' Views About Taking a Polypill to Manage Cardiovascular Risk: A Qualitative Study in Primary Care

British Journal of General Practice
MedicineFamily Practice
2015English

AB0734 Evaluation of Cardiovascular Risk Profiles in a Population of Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Cross-Sectional Study

2017English

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Comorbidities: A Large Cross-Sectional Study in Primary Care

British Journal of General Practice
MedicineFamily Practice
2017English

Gout Severity, Socioeconomic Status and Work Absence: A Cross-Sectional Study in Primary Care

Arthritis Care and Research
Rheumatology
2018English

Risk Factors of Cardiovascular Diseases and Cardiovascular Risk Assessment in the Bank Employees of Western Maharashtra – A Cross Sectional Study

Journal of Medical Science And clinical Research
2018English

Prevalence and Predictors of Resistant Hypertension in a Primary Care Setting: A Cross-Sectional Study

BMC Family Practice
Family Practice
2014English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy