Meta-Analyses and Megatrials: Neither Is the Infallible, Universal Standard

Evidence-Based Mental Health - United Kingdom
doi 10.1136/ebmh.7.2.34
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

BMJ

Related search

Nuts and Bolts of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, Including Network Meta-Analyses

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
Sports MedicineRheumatologyOrthopedicsBiomedical Engineering
2019English

Recent Meta-Analyses Neglect Previous Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses About the Same Topic: A Systematic Examination

BMC Medicine
Medicine
2015English

Individual Participant Data Meta-Analyses Compared With Meta-Analyses Based on Aggregate Data

Trials
MedicinePharmacology
2011English

Conferencing Is Not a Luxury and Neither Is the Scholarly Life of Our Future Colleagues

PS - Political Science and Politics
SociologyPolitical Science
2019English

The Mandelbrot Set Is Universal

2000English

Perineural Dexamethasone – The Dilemma of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

British Journal of Anaesthesia
AnesthesiologyPain Medicine
2018English

Heterogeneity in Meta-Analyses. Comparing Apples and Oranges?

Anaesthesia
AnesthesiologyPain Medicine
2017English

Which Is More Generalizable, Powerful and Interpretable in Meta-Analyses, Mean Difference or Standardized Mean Difference?

BMC Medical Research Methodology
EpidemiologyHealth Informatics
2014English

The Last Infallible Remedy for Epilepsy

BMJ
1862English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy