"Practical Necessity" or "Highly Sophisticated Opportunism"? Judicial Review and Rate Regulation After ATCO Gas and Pipelines Ltd. V. Alberta (Energyand Utilties Board)

Alberta Law Review
doi 10.29173/alr361
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

University of Alberta Libraries

Related search

On ATCO Gas and Pipelines: A Reply to Professor Woolley

Alberta Law Review
2015English

Practical Diagnostics of Russian Gas Transmission Pipelines

1996English

Practice and Procedure Before the Alberta Oil and Gas Conservation Board and the Alberta Gas Utilities Board Pursuant to the Oil and Gas Conservation Act, the Gas Resources Preservation Act and the Gas Utilities Act

Alberta Law Review
1969English

Judicial Review of and Appeals From Conservation Board Orders

Alberta Law Review
1969English

Commissioner for Inland Revenue v Lever Brothers and Unilever Ltd: A Practical Problem of Source

Southern African Business Review
2019English

Assessment and Analysis of the Decision of the Alberta Court of Appeal in OMERS Energy v. Alberta (Energy Resources Conservation Board)

Alberta Law Review
2012English

Highly Tensioned Suspended Pipelines

2000English

Judicial Review and Judicial Activism in Japan

Law and Contemporary Problems
Law
1990English

Hyperspectral Gas Analyzer for Monitoring of Oil and Gas Pipelines

2016English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy