Evaluating the Reliability of Expert Evidence in Compensation Procedures: Are Diagnosticians Influenced by the Narrative Fallacy When Assessing the Psychological Injuries of Trauma Victims?

Psychological Injury and Law - United States
doi 10.1007/s12207-016-9263-5
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Related search

Predetermining Value Analysis of the Prehospital Phase Procedures in Trauma Victims Survival

Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem
Nursing
2008English

Treatment of the Victims of Trauma

Advances in Psychiatric Treatment
2008English

Why the Whats Are When: Mutually Contextualizing Realms of Narrative

Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society
2014English

The Reliability of the ICD-AIS Map in Identifying Serious Road Traffic Injuries From the Helsinki Trauma Registry

Injury
SurgeryOrthopedicsSports MedicineEmergency Medicine
2019English

“You Are the Victims, Not the Perpetrators”: Narrating Violence and Trauma in Arundhati Roy’s the God of Small Things

Ars et Humanitas
ArtsHumanities
2018English

Expert Psychological Testimony About Child Complainants in Sexual Abuse Prosecutions: A Foray Into the Admissibility of Novel Psychological Evidence

Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
Law
1986English

A Transatlantic Perspective on the Compensation of Crime Victims in the United States

Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
Law
1994English

Compensation for Victims of Crime

Social Service Review
SociologyPolitical ScienceSocial Work
1966English

Assessing the Reliability Function of Nanocomponents

Journal of Applied Probability
MathematicsStatisticsUncertaintyProbability
2011English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy