Should We Modify the Protocol of a Systematic Review to Include a Relevant Study?

Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery - United States
doi 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.02.036
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Elsevier BV

Related search

Measurement of Visceral Fat: Should We Include Retroperitoneal Fat?

PLoS ONE
Multidisciplinary
2014English

How Do We Define and Measure Sarcopenia? Protocol for a Systematic Review

Systematic Reviews
Medicine
2018English

How Personalized Should We Be? A Systematic Review of Tailored & Targeted Health Communication Interventions to Improve Adherence

Value in Health
MedicineHealth PolicyPublic HealthOccupational HealthEnvironmental
2013English

What Should We Include in a Cultural Competence Curriculum? An Emerging Formative Evaluation Process to Foster Curriculum Development

Academic Medicine
MedicineEducation
2011English

Effectiveness of Capacity Building Interventions Relevant to Public Health Practice: A Systematic Review

BMC Public Health
EnvironmentalPublic HealthOccupational Health
2018English

Built to Last? The Sustainability of Health System Improvements, Interventions and Change Strategies: A Study Protocol for a Systematic Review

BMJ Open
Medicine
2017English

Regression Testing – A Protocol for Systematic Literature Review

2018English

The Taxonomy of Viruses Should Include Viruses

Archives of Virology
MedicineVirology
2016English

Antibiotic Treatment for Ocular Toxoplasmosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Study Protocol

Systematic Reviews
Medicine
2019English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy