Amanote Research

Amanote Research

    RegisterSign In

“Ratios” and “Differences” in Perceived Sweetness Intensity

Perception & Psychophysics
doi 10.3758/bf03210417
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract

Available in full text

Date

July 1, 1988

Authors
Cees De GraafJan E. R. Frijters
Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC


Related search

Table 2: Significant Differences for TENS Current Intensity Values Perceived by Participants.

English

Differences in Cortical Coding of Heat Evoked Pain Beyond the Perceived Intensity: An fMRI and EEG Study

Human Brain Mapping
Nuclear MedicineRadiologyUltrasound TechnologyAnatomyRadiologicalNeurologyImaging
2013English

Computing Adjusted Risk Ratios and Risk Differences in Stata

Stata Journal
Mathematics
2013English

Time and Intensity as Determiners of Perceived Shape.

Journal of Experimental Psychology
1956English

Generational Differences in Perceived Lip Protrusion Esthetics.

English

Phylogenetic Differences in Content and Intensity of Periodic Proteins

Journal of Molecular Evolution
EvolutionEcologyGeneticsMolecular BiologySystematicsBehavior
2005English

Sweetness and Sucking Have Analgesic Effect in Babies

BMJ
1999English

Demographic Differences and Perceived Engagement Among Islamic Banking Employees in Malaysia

Journal of Social Sciences Research
ArtsFinanceHumanitiesEconomicsEconometricsSocial Sciences
2018English

Owner Perceived Differences Between Mixed-Breed and Purebred Dogs

PLoS ONE
Multidisciplinary
2017English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy