Thoracoscopic Approach to Lobectomy for Lung Cancer Does Not Compromise Oncologic Efficacy

Annals of Thoracic Surgery - Netherlands
doi 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.03.018
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Elsevier BV

Related search

Anaesthesia for Thoracoscopic Pulmonary Lobectomy

Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia
MedicineAnesthesiologyPain Medicine
1993English

Right Predilection of Lung Cancer, Does It Affect Oncologic Outcome?

Acta Oncologica Turcica
2019English

Still Not Enough Data Yet – Sublobar Resection Versus Lobectomy for Lung Cancer

Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Respiratory MedicinePulmonaryCardiovascular MedicineSurgeryCardiology
2019English

P1.16-32 Lung Cancer Completeness of Resection in Uniportal Versus Multiportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Lobectomy

Journal of Thoracic Oncology
MedicineOncologyRespiratory MedicinePulmonary
2018English

Cerebral Infarction After Lobectomy for Lung Cancer

Journal of Surgery
2019English

Evolution of Lobectomy for Lung Cancer: From Open to Robotic Surgery

Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research
2019English

OA06.02 Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery vs. Thoracotomy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Oncologic Outcome of a Randomized Trial

Journal of Thoracic Oncology
MedicineOncologyRespiratory MedicinePulmonary
2018English

OA06.03 Sublobar Resection Is Equivalent to Lobectomy for Screen Detected Lung Cancer

Journal of Thoracic Oncology
MedicineOncologyRespiratory MedicinePulmonary
2018English

A Compromise Approach to Compromise Verdicts

California Law Review
Law
2001English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy