Prenatal Screening Markers for Down Syndrome: Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive and Negative Expected Value Method

Journal of Medical Biochemistry - Serbia
doi 10.1515/jomb-2017-0022
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)

Related search

Self-Learning Concepts of Diagnostic Tests by Graphical Approach: Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive Value

Journal of North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences
2012English

Prenatal Screening: It Is Not Just About Down Syndrome

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
GynecologyObstetrics
2017English

Negative Expected Value Suits

1998English

Sensitivity and Specificity or Positive and Negative Percent Agreement? A Micro-Comic Strip

Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Microbiology
2017English

Prenatal Diagnosis of Down Syndrome

2011English

Prenatal Diagnosis: Down Syndrome or More?

Human Mutation
Genetics
2017English

Prenatal Ultrasound Screening: False Positive Soft Markers May Alter Maternal Representations and Mother-Infant Interaction

2012English

Prenatal Screening for Down Syndrome in Twin Pregnancies: Estimates of Screening Performance Based on 61 Affected and 7,302 Unaffected Twin Pregnancies

Prenatal Diagnosis
GynecologyGeneticsObstetrics
2018English

Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive and Negative Predictive Values and Diagnostic Accuracy of DaTscan™ (Ioflupane I123 Injection): Predicting Clinical Diagnosis in Early Clinically Uncertain Parkinsonian Syndrome

Journal of Neurology & Stroke
2014English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy