Advantages Offered by the Double Magnetic Loops Versus the Conventional Single Ones

PLoS ONE- United States

doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0211626

Full Text

Abstract

Available in

Date

Authors

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Related search

Double-Surface Intensive Phototherapy Versus Single-Surface Conventional Phototherapy in Treatment of Neonatal Hyperbilirubinemia

Annals of the College of Medicine, Mosul
2013English

Breaking the Matching in Nested Case–control Data Offered Several Advantages for Risk Estimation

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Epidemiology
2017English

Single Versus Double-Unit Transfusion Policy in Hematology

Haematologica
Hematology
2012English

Magnetic Monopole Loops Supported by a Meron Pair as the Quark Confiner

2012English

Single Versus Double Lung Transplantation in the Setting of Constrained Donor Availability

Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
CardiologyTransplantationCardiovascular MedicinePulmonaryRespiratory MedicineSurgery
2016English

Physiological Responses to Single Versus Double Stepping Pattern of Ascending the Stairs

Journal of PHYSIOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGY and Applied Human Science
2005English

Superposition of DC Magnetic Fields by Cascading Multiple Magnets in Magnetic Loops

AIP Advances
NanotechnologyAstronomyPhysicsNanoscience
2015English

The QED Vacuum Polarization Function at Four Loops and the Anomalous Magnetic Moment at Five Loops

Nuclear Physics B
High Energy PhysicsNuclear
2013English

Conventional Pancreticojejunostomy Versus Suture-Less Binding Pancreaticogastrostomy- A Single Institution Single Surgeon Comparitive Study

HPB
HepatologyGastroenterology
2018Tagalog

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2026 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy