DO QUIESCENT AND ACTIVE GALAXIES HAVE DIFFERENTMBH-σ*RELATIONS?

Astrophysical Journal - United States
doi 10.1088/0004-637x/772/1/49
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

IOP Publishing

Related search

Why Post-Starburst Galaxies Are Now Quiescent

Astrophysical Journal
AstrophysicsAstronomyPlanetary ScienceSpace
2018English

A Consistent Set of Empirical Scaling Relations for Spiral Galaxies: The (V Max, M oM)–(σ 0, M BH, Φ) Relations

Astrophysical Journal
AstrophysicsAstronomyPlanetary ScienceSpace
2019English

Evolution of the MBH–σ and MBH– Lbulge Relations

Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union
AstrophysicsAstronomyPlanetary ScienceSpace
2009English

An Absence of Radio-Loud Active Galactic Nuclei in Geometrically Flat Quiescent Galaxies: Implications for Maintenance-Mode Feedback Models

Astrophysical Journal Letters
AstrophysicsAstronomyPlanetary ScienceSpace
2019English

Relics of Nuclear Activity: Do All Galaxies Have Massive Black Holes?

Symposium - International Astronomical Union
1999English

On the M-Σ Relationship and SMBH Mass Estimates of Selected Nearby Galaxies

International Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics
2013English

On the Onset of Galactic Winds in Quiescent Star Forming Galaxies

Astronomy and Astrophysics
AstrophysicsAstronomyPlanetary ScienceSpace
2007English

OSSE Observations of Active Galaxies and Quasars

1993English

High-Redshift Massive Quiescent Galaxies Are as Flat as Star-Forming Galaxies: The Flattening of Galaxies and the Correlation With Structural Properties in CANDELS/3D-HST

Astrophysical Journal
AstrophysicsAstronomyPlanetary ScienceSpace
2019English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy