Using the Errors-In-Variables Method in Two-Group Pretest-Posttest Designs

Methodology - United States
doi 10.1027/1614-2241/a000122
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Leibniz-Institute for Psychology Information (ZPID)

Related search

Why Is the One-Group Pretest–Posttest Design Still Used?

Clinical Nursing Research
Nursing
2016English

Comparing Models of Change to Estimate the Mediated Effect in the Pretest–Posttest Control Group Design

Structural Equation Modeling
SociologyFinanceDecision SciencesEconomicsSimulationPolitical ScienceModelingEconometrics
2017English

Assessment of Non-Normality in Pretest-Posttest Research Under Screening of the Pretest Score

Journal of the Japanese Society of Computational Statistics
2008English

Power in Randomized Group Comparisons: The Value of Adding a Single Intermediate Time Point to a Traditional Pretest-Posttest Design.

Psychological Methods
Philosophy of SciencePsychologyHistory
2002English

Empirical Likelihood-Based Estimation of the Treatment Effect in a Pretest–Posttest Study

Journal of the American Statistical Association
UncertaintyStatisticsProbability
2008English

Two-Group Experimental Designs

Western Journal of Nursing Research
Nursing
2003English

Examining Students’ Self-Perceived Competence and Comfort in an Experiential Play Therapy Counseling Course: A Single Group Pretest-Posttest Investigation

International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
2017English

Continuous Predictors of Pretest-Posttest Change: Highlighting the Impact of the Regression Artifact

Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics
Applied MathematicsStatisticsProbability
2019English

Response Shift Bias: A Problem in Evaluating Leadership Development With Self-Report Pretest-Posttest Measures

Journal of Agricultural Education
1999English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy