False-Positive Results Released by Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Tests Highlight the Importance of Clinical Confirmation Testing for Appropriate Patient Care

Genetics in Medicine - United States
doi 10.1038/gim.2018.38
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Related search

Genetic Testing Integration Panels (GTIPs): A Novel Approach for Considering Integration of Direct-To-Consumer and Other New Genetic Tests Into Patient Care

Journal of Genetic Counseling
Genetics
2012English

Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Testing

British Medical Journal
Medicine
2019English

Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Testing

Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
Forensic MedicinePathologyMolecular Medicine
2009English

Impact of Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Testing on Australian Clinical Genetics Services

2020English

Effects of Direct-To-Consumer Advertising and Clinical Guidelines on Appropriate Use of Human Papillomavirus DNA Tests

Medical Care
EnvironmentalPublic HealthOccupational Health
2011English

Autobiologies on YouTube: Narratives of Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Testing

New Genetics and Society
GeneticsHealth PolicyLegal AspectsHealthEthicsIssues
2014English

Who Are You Going to Call? Primary Care Patients’ Disclosure Decisions Regarding Direct–to–Consumer Genetic Testing

Narrative inquiry in bioethics
Medicine
2014English

Pheochromocytoma Due to TMEM127 Mutation – The Importance of Genetic Testing for Clinical Decision

European Endocrinology
EndocrineEndocrinologyMetabolismAutonomic SystemsDiabetes
2020English

ASHG Statement* on Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Testing in the United States

Obstetrics and Gynecology
GynecologyObstetrics
2007English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy