Amanote Research

Amanote Research

    RegisterSign In

Why Rational Argument Fails the Genetic Modification (GM) Debate

Food Security - Germany
doi 10.1007/s12571-018-0832-1
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
DevelopmentAgronomyCrop ScienceFood Science
Date

October 1, 2018

Authors
Lucy MallinsonJean RussellDuncan D. CameronJurriaan TonPeter HortonMargo E. Barker
Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC


Related search

The Problematic Alleviating Suffering Argument: Why Genetic Engineering Is Unnecessary

The Maastricht Journal of Liberal Arts
2017English

The Christian Delusion: Why Faith Fails

Philosophia Christi
PhilosophyReligious Studies
2011English

Win the Argument and Lose the Debate

Science
MultidisciplinaryPhilosophy of ScienceHistory
1960English

Why the Top Two Primary Fails California Voters

California Journal of Politics and Policy
2015English

The Symbolic-Consequences Argument in the Sex Robot Debate

2017English

GM Debate Must Go Global, Says Meeting…

Nature
Multidisciplinary
2000English

Rational Debate and One-Dimensional Conflict

SSRN Electronic Journal
2000English

Why Information Systems Replication Strategy Fails in Transnational Operation

Advances in Logistics, Operations, and Management Science
2014English

Assisted Suicide: Why Psychiatrists Should Engage in the Debate

British Journal of Psychiatry
MedicinePsychiatryMental Health
2011English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2026 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy