Comparison of Bioaerosol Sampling Methods for Swine Barns

Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports
doi 10.4148/2378-5977.6658
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

New Prairie Press

Related search

Air Quality in Swine-Finishing Barns

Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports
2000English

A Comparison of Sampling Methods for Examining the Laryngeal Microbiome

PLoS ONE
Multidisciplinary
2017English

Comparison of Methods of Predicting Breeding Values of Swine

Journal of Animal Science
Animal ScienceZoologyGeneticsMedicineFood Science
1988English

Comparison on Effects of Different Sampling Methods for the Disinfection of Ventilator Pipes

2016English

Figure 3: Comparison of Cluster Methods With Varying Sampling Intensity.

English

Comparison of Non-Invasive Sampling Methods for Detection of HPV in Rural African Women

Sexually Transmitted Infections
DermatologyInfectious Diseases
2005English

Sampling Methods for Online Surveys

2017English

Sampling Harmful Benthic Dinoflagellates: Comparison of Artificial and Natural Substrate Methods

Harmful Algae
Plant ScienceAquatic Science
2014English

A Direct Comparison of Scan and Focal Sampling Methods for Measuring Wild Chimpanzee Feeding Behaviour

Folia Primatologica
EvolutionEcologySystematicsAnimal ScienceBehaviorZoology
2010English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy