Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Double Blind Peer-Review in Humanities
Humanities
doi 10.3390/h5010001
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
December 23, 2015
Authors
Martyn Rittman
Albrecht Classen
Publisher
MDPI AG
Related search
Announcement: Double-Blind Peer Review
Nature Structural and Molecular Biology
Structural Biology
Molecular Biology
SETAC Journals Adopt Double-Blind Peer Review
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
Development
Medicine
Planning
Environmental Science
Geography
SETAC Journals Adopt Double-Blind Peer Review
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
Mutagenesis
Environmental Chemistry
Health
Toxicology
Blind Dates in Sciences: Dealing With Rejection in Peer Review
Circulation Research
Cardiovascular Medicine
Physiology
Cardiology
Peer Review of Peer Review?
Science
Multidisciplinary
Philosophy of Science
History
How Double Blind Is Double Blind? And Does It Matter?
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Pharmacology
The Myth of Double-Blind Review Revisited: ACL vs. EMNLP
Peer Review Matters: Creating Effective Peer Review
Language Arts Journal of Michigan
Double-Blind and Single-Blind Retractable Placebo Needles
Anaesthesia
Anesthesiology
Pain Medicine