Tools Used to Assess the Quality of Peer Review Reports: A Methodological Systematic Review

BMC Medical Research Methodology - United Kingdom
doi 10.1186/s12874-019-0688-x
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Related search

Systematic Review Adherence to Methodological or Reporting Quality

Systematic Reviews
Medicine
2017English

Outcome Measures Used to Assess Interventions for Asthma Control: A Systematic Review

Value in Health
MedicineHealth PolicyPublic HealthOccupational HealthEnvironmental
2017English

Tools That Assess Functional Decline: Systematic Literature Review Update

Clinical Interventions in Aging
MedicineGerontologyGeriatrics
2013English

A Systematic Review of Tools Used to Screen and Assess for Externalising Behaviour Symptoms in Low and Middle Income Settings

Global Mental Health
2019English

Tools to Assess the Measurement Properties of Quality of Life Instruments: A Meta-Review Protocol

BMJ Open
Medicine
2018English

Pms94 - Availability of Tools to Assess Proms in Hip Arthroplasty in Spain. A Systematic Review.

Value in Health
MedicineHealth PolicyPublic HealthOccupational HealthEnvironmental
2018English

What Is Open Peer Review? A Systematic Review

F1000Research
GeneticsMolecular BiologyPharmacologyBiochemistryMicrobiology ImmunologyMedicineToxicologyPharmaceutics
2017English

Quality and Acceptability of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Used to Assess Fatigue in Axial Spondyloarthritis (axSpA): A Systematic Review (Protocol)

Systematic Reviews
Medicine
2018English

Confidential Reports May Improve Peer Review

Nature
Multidisciplinary
2004English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy