Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Figure 3: Micro-Aggregate Fractal Dimension Change With Time Since Cropland Abandonment in Various Vegetation Rehabilitation Patterns.
doi 10.7717/peerj.8090/fig-3
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Figure 2: Particle Fractal Dimension Change With Time Since Cropland Abandonment in Various Vegetation Restoration Patterns.
Figure 4: Erodibility Change With Time Since Cropland Abandonment in Various Vegetation Rehabilitation Patterns.
Table 2: Tests of the Soil Particle Fractal Dimension, Micro-Aggregate Fractal Dimension, Erodibility Linkage With Time (Years Since Cropland Abandonment), Rehabilitation Pattern and Soil Depth.
Figure 6: The Differences of Micro-Aggregate Fractal Dimension Between the Natural Forest and Various Vegetation Restoration Patterns at Each Last Restoration Year.
Figure 8: Biplot of the First Two RDA Axes Between the Vegetation Rehabilitation Patterns, Soil Depth, Restoration Time and Fractal Dimension, Erodibility (K Factor), TC, TOC, TN, Each Classes Particles and Micro-Aggregate.
Table 3: Relationships Between Particle Fractal Dimension, Micro-Aggregate Fractal Dimension, Erodibility and Soil Nutrients and Soil Bulk Density.
Figure 5: The Differences of Particle Fractal Dimension Between the Natural Forest and Various Vegetation Restoration Patterns at Each Last Restoration Year.
Table S2: Micro-Aggregate Fractal Dimensions of Different Rehabilitation Type Over Different Years
Recognition of Patterns With Fractal Structure in Time Series
Pattern Recognition and Classification in Time Series Data
