Comment on Schecklmann Et Al.: A Call to Consider Both “Negative” and “Positive” Results in Brain Research on Tinnitus

Brain Structure and Function - Germany
doi 10.1007/s00429-013-0567-x
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Related search

Comment on Zhou Et Al.

2019English

Comment on Myers Et Al

Psychonomic Science
1966English

An Ethical Evaluation of Telemedicine Applications Must Consider Four Major Aspects – A Comment on Kidholm Et Al.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Health Policy
2012English

Pushing the Syndemic Research Agenda Forward: A Comment on Pitpitan Et Al

Annals of Behavioral Medicine
MedicinePsychiatryMental HealthPsychology
2013English

The Future of Ecological Inference Research: A Comment on Freedman Et Al.

Journal of the American Statistical Association
UncertaintyStatisticsProbability
1999English

Reply to Referee Comment on S. Liu Et Al.

2019English

Niche Expansion by Positive Interactions: Realizing the Fundamentals. A Comment on Rodriguez-Cabal Et Al.

Ideas in Ecology and Evolution
2012English

Comment on Lee Et Al. Diabetes 2015;64:2836–2846. Comment on Roberts Et Al. Diabetes 2015;64:471–484

Diabetes
Internal MedicineEndocrinologyMetabolismDiabetes
2016English

Comment on Study by Perkins Et Al.

Diabetes Care
Internal MedicineEndocrinologyAdvancedMetabolismSpecialized NursingDiabetes
2002English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy