Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Figure 5: Mean Value of the (A) Specificity and (B) NPV With Corresponding 95% CI on Different Datasets With Different Number of Historical Hospitalization Records.
doi 10.7717/peerj.3230/fig-5
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Figure 2: Activity Densities (Mean ± 95% CI) of Carabid Beetles (A), Staphylinid Beetles (B) and Spiders (C) for the Four Different Pitfall Trap Types.
Figure 4: Mean Square Error (MSE), Coverage, and Width of 95% Confidence Interval With Different Number of Studies Included (M).
Figure 2: Mean Square Error (MSE), Coverage, and Width of 95% Confidence Interval With Different ORs.
Figure 5: (A) Presents the Predicted Cosinor Function (±95% CI) Superimposed Over the Local Polynomial Fit of the Raw Data (±95% CI).
Figure 5: Comparison of the Number of ncRNAs Associated With Metabolic Syndrome in Different Databases.
Figure 3: Clustering Performance With a Different Number of Samples.
Figure 1: Vegetative Tiller Number (A) and Reproductive Tiller Number (B) (Mean ± 1 s.e.) of C. Virgata Under Different Precipitation Regimes at Different Seedling Emergence Times.
Figure 3: Seed Number (A) and Seed Size (B) (Mean ± 1 s.e.) of C. Virgata Under Different Precipitation Regimes at Different Sowing Times.
Figure 8: The Mean (±95% CI) Retention Potential for the Deer and Raccoon Pelts.
