Digital Intraoral Scanners vs Traditional Impressions: Fitting Accuracy of Screwed Mesostructures

Clinical Oral Implants Research - United Kingdom
doi 10.1111/clr.349_13042
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
Oral Surgery
Date
Authors

Unknown

Publisher

Wiley

Related search

Correction: Accuracy of Four Digital Scanners According to Scanning Strategy in Complete-Arch Impressions

PLoS ONE
Multidisciplinary
2018English

Digital and Silicone Impressions vs Digital Calipers

Journal of Medical and Dental Practice
2018English

Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Implant Impressions

Clinical Oral Implants Research
Oral Surgery
2017English

Trueness and Precision of 5 Intraoral Scanners in the Impressions of Single and Multiple Implants: A Comparative in Vitro Study

BMC Oral Health
Dentistry
2019English

Comparing the Accuracy of Cone Beam Computed Tomography,Digital Intraoral Radiography and Conventional Intraoral Radiography in the Measurement of Periodontal Bone Defects

Journal of Research in Dental and Maxillofacial Sciences
2016English

Film Digitizers vs. CCD Scanners

South African Journal of Radiology
RadiologicalRadiologyNuclear MedicineUltrasound TechnologyImaging
1997English

Accuracy on Scanned Images of Full Arch Models With Orthodontic Brackets by Various Intraoral Scanners in the Presence of Artificial Saliva

BioMed Research International
ImmunologyMolecular BiologyBiochemistryMicrobiology MedicineGenetics
2020English

Accuracy of Implant Casts Generated With Conventional and Digital Impressions - An in Vitro Study

Clinical Oral Implants Research
Oral Surgery
2017English

Accuracy of Dies Captured by an Intraoral Digital Impression System Using Parallel Confocal Imaging

International Journal of Prosthodontics
MedicineOral Surgery
2013English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy