Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Figure S1: Inter-Annual Differences in Feather Length (FL) and Feather Growth Rate (FGR) for the Southern Storm-Petrel Species.
doi 10.7717/peerj.7807/supp-1
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Figure 1: Correlation Between Feather Growth Rate (FGR) and Feather Length (FL) for All Four Studied Storm-Petrel Species.
Table 1: Results of the Post-Hoc Dunn Test for Inter-Specific Differences in Feather Length (FL) and Feather Growth Rate (FGR) for Each Studied Species.
Figure S2: Relationship Between Daily Feather Growth Rate (FGR) and Feather Length (FL) for Non-Procellariiformes Reported in Literature
Table 2: Spearmans Rank Correlation Output for Correlations Between Feather Growth Rate (FGR) and Feather Length (FL) for Each Studied Species.
Table 3: Phylogenetic Generalized Least Squares (PGLS) Models for Feather Growth Rate (FGR) Based on Feather Length (FL).
Table S2: Phylogenetic Generalized Least Squares (PGLS) Models for Feather Growth Rate (FGR) Based on Feather Length (FL) Per Feather Type
Differences in Tail Feather Growth Rate in Storm-Petrels Breeding in the Northern and Southern Hemisphere: A Ptilochronological Approach
PeerJ
Genetics
Molecular Biology
Biochemistry
Biological Sciences
Medicine
Agricultural
Neuroscience
Figure 3: Predicted Feather Growth Rates (FGR) and Their Residuals Based on the Optimized Phylogenetic Generalized Least Squares (PGLS) Model for Individual Storm-Petrels.
Feather Growth and Moult in Some Captive Finches
Bird Study
Evolution
Ecology
Nature
Systematics
Behavior
Landscape Conservation
