Catalase in Fluvial Biofilms: A Comparison Between Different Extraction Methods and Example of Application in a Metal-Polluted River

Ecotoxicology - Netherlands
doi 10.1007/s10646-010-0564-2
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Related search

Comparison Between Extraction Methods of Photosynthetic Pigments in Acacia Mangium

Communications in Plant Sciences
2019English

Solidification/Stabilization of Metal Polluted Sediment of Krivaja River

Hemijska Industrija
ChemistryChemical Engineering
2012English

Cancer Risk Near a Polluted River in Finland

Environmental Health Perspectives
MutagenesisPublic HealthEnvironmentalHealthToxicologyOccupational Health
2004English

Comparison Between Sprint Training Methods in Different Types of Athletes

2019English

Comparison of Six Different Pretreatment Methods for Blood RNA Extraction

Biopreservation and Biobanking
BiochemistryMedicineGeneticsCell BiologyMolecular Biology
2015English

Determination of Phosphate Ions in Polluted River Water by Extraction With N-Butylacetate

Bunseki Kagaku
Analytical Chemistry
1967English

Blind Source Separation and Feature Extraction in Concurrent Control Charts Pattern Recognition: Novel Analyses and a Comparison of Different Methods

Computers and Industrial Engineering
EngineeringComputer Science
2016English

Comparison Between Different Numerical Methods for Discretization of PDEs-A Short Review

2010English

A Comparison of Different Methods of Estimating Energy‐limited Evapotranspiration in the Peace River Region of British Columbia

Atmosphere - Ocean
Atmospheric ScienceOceanography
1991English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy