(PDF) Mp05-08 Association of Modified Surgical Technique

Mp05-08 Association of Modified Surgical Technique for Patients With Shorter Membranous Urethral Length and Early Recovery of Incontinence After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy

Journal of Urology - Netherlands

doi 10.1016/j.juro.2018.02.179

Full Text

Open PDF

Abstract

Available in full text

Date

April 1, 2018

Authors

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Related search

S&t-18 Preoperative Membranous Urethral Length Becomes Predict Factor for the Early Urinary Incontinence After Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

Journal of Urology

Urology

2016

English

Mp05-03 a Combination of Preoperative Membranous Urethral Length and Postoperative Bladder Neck Angle Is a Reliable Predictive Factor for Early Recovery of Urinary Continence After Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

Journal of Urology

Urology

2018

English

Incidence of Bladder Neck Contracture After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic and Open Radical Prostatectomy

BJU International

Urology

2010

English

Fertility in Patients After Surgical Repair of Membranous Urethral Strictures Associated With Pelvic Fractures

Japanese Journal of Urology

Urology

1992

English

The Relation Between Turkish Symptom Score, Maximal Urethral Flow Velocity, Residual Volume, Functional Urethral Length, Prostatic Urethral Length and Post Prostatectomy Incontinence

Kafkas Journal of Medical Sciences

2013

English

Mp05-07 Should Gleason Score at the Positive Surgical Margin Appear on the Pathology Report for Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy?

Journal of Urology

Urology

2018

English

Obturator Compartment Syndrome Secondary to Pelvic Hematoma After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

Journal of Endourology Case Reports

Urology

2016

English

Corrigendum Re: “Effect of a Risk-Stratified Grade of Nerve-Sparing Technique on Early Return of Continence After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy” [Eur Urol 2013;63:438–44]

European Urology

Urology

2015

English

Corrigendum Re: “Influence of Modified Posterior Reconstruction of the Rhabdosphincter on Early Recovery of Continence and Anastomotic Leakage Rates After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy” [Eur Urol 2011;59:72–80]

European Urology

Urology

2018

English

Amanote Research

Mp05-08 Association of Modified Surgical Technique for Patients With Shorter Membranous Urethral Length and Early Recovery of Incontinence After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy

Journal of Urology - Netherlands

doi 10.1016/j.juro.2018.02.179

Full Text

Abstract

Categories

Date

Authors

Publisher

Related search

S&t-18 Preoperative Membranous Urethral Length Becomes Predict Factor for the Early Urinary Incontinence After Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

Mp05-03 a Combination of Preoperative Membranous Urethral Length and Postoperative Bladder Neck Angle Is a Reliable Predictive Factor for Early Recovery of Urinary Continence After Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

Incidence of Bladder Neck Contracture After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic and Open Radical Prostatectomy

Fertility in Patients After Surgical Repair of Membranous Urethral Strictures Associated With Pelvic Fractures

The Relation Between Turkish Symptom Score, Maximal Urethral Flow Velocity, Residual Volume, Functional Urethral Length, Prostatic Urethral Length and Post Prostatectomy Incontinence

Mp05-07 Should Gleason Score at the Positive Surgical Margin Appear on the Pathology Report for Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy?

Obturator Compartment Syndrome Secondary to Pelvic Hematoma After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

Corrigendum Re: “Effect of a Risk-Stratified Grade of Nerve-Sparing Technique on Early Return of Continence After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy” [Eur Urol 2013;63:438–44]

Corrigendum Re: “Influence of Modified Posterior Reconstruction of the Rhabdosphincter on Early Recovery of Continence and Anastomotic Leakage Rates After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy” [Eur Urol 2011;59:72–80]