Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Groundless Litigation and the Malicious Prosecution Debate: A Historical Analysis
Yale Law Journal
- United States
doi 10.2307/795629
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Categories
Law
Date
May 1, 1979
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
JSTOR
Related search
The Use of Historical Analogies in the Abortion Debate
Catholic Social Science Review
A Historical Inquiry Into the Right to Trial by Jury in Complex Civil Litigation
University of Pennsylvania Law Review
Law
Static Analysis of Malicious Java Applets
Debate on the Teaching of History: Historical Epistemology Meets Nationalist Narrative
Historical Studies in Education / Revue d'histoire de l'éducation
Sir William Fergusson and the Norwich Prosecution
BMJ
Health and Healing in New Testament Times: Historical Understanding and the Health Care Debate
Health SA Gesondheid
Health Policy
Public Health
Occupational Health
Environmental
On the Groundless Use of Mathematics Concerning the D’Alembert’s Rule
International Letters of Chemistry, Physics and Astronomy
Federal Prosecution for the 21st Century
SSRN Electronic Journal
The Prosecuting Attorney. Powers and Duties in Criminal Prosecution
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1931-1951)
