(PDF) Critical Evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for

Critical Evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for the Assessment of the Quality of Nonrandomized Studies in Meta-Analyses

European Journal of Epidemiology - Netherlands

doi 10.1007/s10654-010-9491-z

Full Text

Abstract

Available in full text

Categories

Date

July 22, 2010

Authors

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Related search

Can Herd Immunity Influence the Assessment of Vaccine Efficacy in Nonrandomized Studies?

American Journal of Public Health

Occupational Health

English

Low Reporting Quality of the Meta-Analyses in Diagnostic Pathology

Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

Forensic Medicine

Medical Laboratory Technology

English

The Turkish Adaptation of a Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies: Validity and Reliability Analyses

Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Nursing Sciences

English

Primary Study Quality in Psychological Meta-Analyses: An Empirical Assessment of Recent Practice

Frontiers in Psychology

English

The Utility of Topic Modelling for Discourse Studies: A Critical Evaluation

Discourse Studies

Social Psychology

English

Analysis of the Methodologic Quality of Reporting of Meta-Analyses in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Journal of Anesthesia & Clinical Research

English

Prm263 - The Use of Prisma Statement Improves the Reporting Quality of Meta-Analyses Published in the Field of Psychology

Value in Health

Occupational Health

English

Statistical Issues With the Analysis of Nonrandomized Studies in Comparative Effectiveness Research

Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy

English

Public Health Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Polish Version of the Newcastle Satisfaction With Nursing Scale

Archives of Medical Science

English