Current Brazilian Forest Management Guidelines Are Unsustainable for Swietenia, Cedrela, Amburana, and Copaifera: A Response to Da Cunha and Colleagues

Forest Ecology and Management - Netherlands
doi 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.09.031
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Elsevier BV

Related search

Science, Principles and Forest Management: A Response to Abbott and Christensen

Australian Forestry
Forestry
1969English

Response to Comment by P. Vassilakopoulos and Colleagues

Haematologica
Hematology
2015English

Facebook Addiction: Concerns, Criticism, and Recommendations—A Response to Andreassen and Colleagues

Psychological Reports
Psychology
2012English

The Brazilian Forest Code of 2012: Historical and Legal Analysis and Current Status

Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law
2016English

Climatic Response of Cedrela Fissilis Radial Growth in the Ombrophilous Mixed Forest, Paraná, Brazil

Floresta e Ambiente
Forestry
2019English

Response From Scientific Editor and Colleagues

Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada
Physical TherapySports TherapyRehabilitation
2006English

Cut Points of Waist Circumference: Response to Sone and Colleagues

Diabetes Care
Internal MedicineEndocrinologyAdvancedMetabolismSpecialized NursingDiabetes
2006English

Authors' Reply to Rappuoli and Colleagues, Black, and Glennie and Colleagues

British Medical Journal
Medicine
2014English

Voluntary Carbon Credits From Improved Forest Management: Policy Guidelines and Case Study

IForest
ForestryLandscape ConservationEcologyNature
2018English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy