Publons Peer Evaluation Metrics Are Not Reliable Measures of Quality or Impact

Evidence Based Library and Information Practice - Canada
doi 10.18438/eblip29579
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

University of Alberta Libraries

Related search

Quality Metrics Evaluation of Hyperspectral Images

ISPRS - International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
2014English

Holomorphic Maps Which Preserve Intrinsic Metrics or Measures

Transactions of the American Mathematical Society
MathematicsApplied Mathematics
1990English

Water Distribution Network Reliability: Are Surrogate Measures Reliable?

English

Statistical Evaluation of Image Quality Measures

Journal of Electronic Imaging
Electronic EngineeringMolecular Physics,Computer Science ApplicationsElectricalAtomicOptics
2002English

Impact of Peer Evaluation Confidentiality on Student Marks

International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
2011English

Single Momentary Assessments Are Not Reliable Outcomes for Clinical Trials

Contemporary Clinical Trials
MedicinePharmacology
2010English

Review of Rule Quality Measurement: Metrics and Rule Evaluation Models

International Journal of Computer Engineering in Research Trends
2018English

Identifying Relationships Between Physiological Measures and Evaluation Metrics for 3D Interaction Techniques

Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Computer ScienceTheoretical Computer Science
2011English

Why Most Budget Impact Analyses of Medicines Are Not Accurate? Quality of Budget Impact Analysis Needs to Be Improved

Value in Health
MedicineHealth PolicyPublic HealthOccupational HealthEnvironmental
2018English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy