Amanote Research

Amanote Research

    RegisterSign In

Figure 4: Comparison of Different Techniques for Quantitative Assessment of FAs in Sunflower.

doi 10.7717/peerj.6547/fig-4
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract

Available in full text

Date

Unknown

Authors

Unknown

Publisher

PeerJ


Related search

Figure 1: Dependency Between the Mass Fractions of FAs in Sunflower (Calculated for 11 FAs Detected by GC-FID) Estimated Using Different Methods.

English

Figure 5: Comparison of Different Techniques for FA Quantification in Rapeseed.

English

Quantitative Imaging Techniques for the Assessment of Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia

Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery
Nuclear MedicineRadiologyImaging
2018English

Comparison of Different Thyroidectomy Techniques for Benign Thyroid Disease

Endocrine Journal
EndocrinologyMetabolismDiabetes
2003English

Comparison of Different Detection Methods in Quantitative Microdensitometry

American Journal of Pathology
Forensic MedicinePathology
2001English

Figure 4: Impact of Background Subtraction Techniques on Accuracy of Animal Tracking and Quantitative Behavioural Endpoints.

English

Comparison of Different DC Motor Modeling Techniques

Journal of Electronic Research and Application
2018English

Comparison of Different Techniques to Design of Filter

International Journal of Computer Applications
2014English

A Quantitative Assessment of the Accuracy of Techniques for Calculating Graupel Growth

Journals of the Atmospheric Sciences
Atmospheric Science
1985English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy