Phenomenal Evidence and Factive Evidence Defended: Replies to McGrath, Pautz, and Neta

Philosophical Studies - Netherlands
doi 10.1007/s11098-015-0534-x
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
Philosophy
Date
Authors
Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Related search

Reply to Fumerton, Huemer, and McGrath

Philosophical Studies
Philosophy
2012English

Barriers to Research and Evidence

Evidence Based Library and Information Practice
LibraryInformation Sciences
2013English

Frontloading and Fregean Sense: Reply to Neta, Schroeter and Stanley

Analysis
Philosophy
2014English

Comments and Replies to Published Papers

Journal of Wildlife Management
EvolutionEcologyNatureSystematicsBehaviorLandscape Conservation
2019English

Drowning Prevention: Define and Then Gather Evidence or Gather Evidence to Define?

International Journal of Aquatic Research and Education
Aquatic Science
2019English

Drowning Prevention: Define and Then Gather Evidence or Gather Evidence to Define?

International Journal of Aquatic Research and Education
Aquatic Science
2019English

Interventionism Defended

Logos and Episteme
Philosophy
2015English

Evidence of Expert's Evidence Is Evidence

Episteme
Philosophy of ScienceHistory
2015English

Evidence and Knowledge

Erkenntnis
PhilosophyLogic
2010English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy