Amanote Research

Amanote Research

  • Register
  • Sign In

Minimum Important Difference for Validated Instruments in Women With Urge Incontinence

Neurourology and Urodynamics- United States

doi 10.1002/nau.21028

Full Text

Abstract

Available in

Categories

NeurologyUrology

Date

January 1, 2011

Authors

Keisha Y. DyerYan XuLinda BrubakerIngrid NygaardAlayne MarklandDavid RahnToby C. ChaiAnn StoddardEmily Lukacz

Publisher

Wiley


Related search

Effect of Fluid Management on Fluid Intake and Urge Incontinence in a Trial for Overactive Bladder in Women

BJU International
Urology
2009English

Stress Inconthence and Detrusor Instability/Urge Incontinence

Neurourology and Urodynamics
NeurologyUrology
1985English

Minimum Important Difference of the Incremental Shuttle Walk Test Distance in Patients With COPD

Thorax
PulmonaryRespiratory Medicine
2019English

WhatPredictsand whatMediatesthe Response of Urge Urinary Incontinence to Biofeedback?

Neurourology and Urodynamics
NeurologyUrology
2012English

Can We Predict De Novo Urge Incontinence by Perineal Ultrasound?

Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
2018English

Treatment Options for Women With Stress Urinary Incontinence

Mayo Clinic Proceedings
Medicine
1999English

Urinary Incontinence in Women

Annals of Internal Medicine
Internal MedicineMedicine
2020English

Urinary Incontinence in Women

InnovAiT: Education and inspiration for general practice
2015English

Urinary Incontinence in Women

Public Health Nursing
EnvironmentalPublic HealthNursingOccupational Health
1987English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote


© 2026 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy