Use of Cerebral Revascularization Techniques in the Endovascular Era. Is It Still a Useful Technique?

SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine
doi 10.1007/s42399-019-00158-2
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Related search

Mehran Contrast Nephropathy Risk Score: Is It Still Useful 10 Years Later?

Journal of Cardiology
Cardiovascular MedicineCardiology
2016English

Measles: Is It Still a Threat?

British Journal of General Practice
MedicineFamily Practice
2018English

An Imperfect Model Is Still Useful

Addiction
MedicinePsychiatryMental Health
2019English

Epinephrine Auto-Injector Use on YouTube: Is It Really Useful?

Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine
2019English

Treatment of Uncomplicated Acute Type B Aortic Dissection in the Endovascular Era: Is It Time for a Paradigm Shift?

Journal of Thoracic Disease
PulmonaryRespiratory Medicine
2017English

Quantitative Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging in the Differential Diagnosis of Parotid Gland Tumors: Is It a Useful Technique?

Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Medical Sciences
Medicine
2010English

It Is Still Winter Here

The Iowa Review
1977English

Total Arterial Revascularization—is It for Everyone?

Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Respiratory MedicinePulmonaryCardiovascular MedicineSurgeryCardiology
2019English

Cerebral Revascularization

Skull Base
2005English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy