Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Figure 1: Tumors With a Longer Diameter in 2D Cross-Sections May Hold a Smaller Volume in 3D Images.
doi 10.7717/peerj.8637/fig-1
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Figure 3: A Longer 2D Diameter Was Not Equal to a Larger 3D Volume in Our Cases.
Fast Multi-Core Based Multimodal Registration of 2D Cross-Sections and 3D Datasets
BMC Bioinformatics
Biochemistry
Applied Mathematics
Computer Science Applications
Structural Biology
Molecular Biology
Clinicopathological Factors and Prognosis in Gastric Cancers Evaluated by Longer Diameter of Tumors
The journal of the Japanese Practical Surgeon Society
Crest Lines Extraction in Volume 3D Medical Images: A Multi-Scale Approach
Surface Reconstruction by Propagating 3D Stereo Data in Multiple 2D Images
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Computer Science
Theoretical Computer Science
When ‘Smaller Is Stronger’ No Longer Holds
Materials Research Letters
Materials Science
Nonlinear Vibrations of Rotating 3d Tapered Beams With Arbitrary Cross Sections
Semantic 3D Reconstruction With Learning MVS and 2D Segmentation of Aerial Images
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
Instrumentation
Materials Science
Fluid Flow
Engineering
Computer Science Applications
Process Chemistry
Transfer Processes
Technology
3D Brain Tumors and Internal Brain Structures Segmentation in MR Images
International Journal of Image, Graphics and Signal Processing
