Table 9: Personalized Re-Ranking of Search Results: This Tables Shown How Integration of Semantic User Profiles for Researchers R6 and R8 Affects Ranking of the Top-10 Results Originally Retrieved and Sorted by a Frequency-Based Method.

doi 10.7717/peerjcs.121/table-9
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date

Unknown

Authors

Unknown

Publisher

PeerJ

Related search

Web Document Clustering and Visualization Results of Semantic Web Search Engine Using V-Ranking

International Journal of Computer Theory and Engineering
2011English

A Study of Different Ranking Approaches for Semantic Search

International Journal of Computer Applications
2015English

A Novel Page Ranking Algorithm for a Personalized Web Search

Journal of Computer Science
Computer NetworksSoftwareArtificial IntelligenceCommunications
2012English

Exploiting Symmetry in Relational Similarity for Ranking Relational Search Results

Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Computer ScienceTheoretical Computer Science
2010English

Net4Lap: Neural Laplacian Regularization for Ranking and Re-Ranking

2018English

Table 2: The Top 10 (A Ranking by P-Value From Metascape) Biological Process of DEGs in HCC.

English

Table 4: Top 10 Co-Cited References Sorted by the Number of Citations.

English

Neural-Ir-Explorer: A Content-Focused Tool to Explore Neural Re-Ranking Results

Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Computer ScienceTheoretical Computer Science
2020English

A Ranking Method for the Concurrent Learning of Compounds With Various Activity Profiles

Journal of Cheminformatics
Computer GraphicsInformation SciencesLibraryTheoretical ChemistryComputer Science ApplicationsComputer-Aided DesignPhysical
2015English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2026 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy