A Comparison of Stimulus Types in Online Classification of the P300 Speller Using Language Models

PLoS ONE - United States
doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0175382
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Related search

A Proposed Method for Increase Accuracy of Classification P300 Speller

International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Information Sciences
2016English

Using the Detectability Index to Predict P300 Speller Performance

Journal of Neural Engineering
Molecular NeuroscienceBiomedical EngineeringCellular
2016English

Does the ‘P300’ Speller Depend on Eye Gaze?

Journal of Neural Engineering
Molecular NeuroscienceBiomedical EngineeringCellular
2010English

P300 Speller Performance Predictor Based on RSVP Multi-Feature

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Mental HealthNeuropsychologyPhysiological PsychologyNeurologyBehavioral NeurosciencePsychiatryBiological Psychiatry
2019English

Preliminary Results Using a P300 Brain-Computer Interface Speller: A Possible Interaction Effect Between Presentation Paradigm and Set of Stimuli

Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Computer ScienceTheoretical Computer Science
2019English

EMG Speller With Adaptive Stimulus Rate and Dictionary Support

2014English

Extraversion and the P300 in a Visual Classification Task

Personality and Individual Differences
Psychology
1994English

The Three Types of Factor Models: A Comparison of Their Explanatory Power

Financial Analysts Journal
AccountingEconomicsFinanceEconometrics
1995English

Classification of Thyroid Disease by Using Data Mining Models: A Comparison of Decision Tree Algorithms

The Oxford Journal of Intelligent Decision and Data Science
2016English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy