Amanote Research

Amanote Research

    RegisterSign In

Figure 8: Sample Percent Distribution With Respect to Coherence Levels / Comparing “H” and “S” Choosers —Sub-Sample “EMPLOYMENT.”

doi 10.7717/peerj.1361/fig-8
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract

Available in full text

Date

Unknown

Authors

Unknown

Publisher

PeerJ


Related search

Table 14: Sample Distribution With Respect to Coherence Levels and Expressed Choice (Total Sample).

English

Figure 1: Percent of Articles by OA Status, Crossref-DOIs Sample vs Unpaywall-DOIs Sample.

English

Probability of Sign Coincidence Centered With Respect to Sample Mean Random Variables

Herald of Tver State University. Series: Applied Mathematics
2019English

Classification of 5-S Epileptic EEG Recordings Using Distribution Entropy and Sample Entropy

Frontiers in Physiology
Physiology
2016English

Figure 2: MetaMSD Sample Outputs.

English

Comparing Species Richness Among Assemblages Using Sample Units: Why Not Use Extrapolation Methods to Standardize Different Sample Sizes?

Oikos
EvolutionEcologySystematicsBehavior
2003English

Distribution Tails of Sample Quantiles and Subexponentiality

Stochastic Processes and their Applications
ModelingApplied MathematicsStatisticsProbabilitySimulation
1998English

Finite-Sample Distribution of Regression Quantiles

Statistics and Probability Letters
UncertaintyStatisticsProbability
2010English

Figure 4: Sample Pooling Affects Estimates of Sample Variance in RT-qPCR.

English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy